ArticleJournal of dental sciences2026
Characterization of the oral microbiota in zygomatic versus dental implants: Implications for full-mouth rehabilitation.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Dental implants are widely used to restore oral function and esthetics in patients with tooth loss. General zygomatic implants (GZIs) are a valuable alternative for patients with severely atrophic maxillae or post-oncologic defects. However, implant placement can alter the ecological balance of the oral microbiota, potentially influencing peri-implant and sinus-related diseases. Because GZIs often traverse or adjoin the maxillary sinus, their microbial environment may differ from that of general dental implants (GDIs). This study aimed to compare microbiota taxonomy between GZI and GDI sites. Materials and methods: Generally healthy adults treated with either general zygomatic implants (GZI group) or general dental implants (GDI group) at a teaching hospital dental clinic were recruited. Biofilm samples were collected from implant surfaces under aseptic conditions. Microbial DNA was extracted and analyzed using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Taxonomic classification and diversity analyses were performed through bioinformatic pipelines to identify bacterial genera and compare microbial community composition between groups. Results: Distinct microbial profiles were observed between the GZI and GDI groups. Rothia, Thermus, and Sphingomonas were significantly more abundant in the GZI group, whereas Capnocytophaga and Leptotrichia predominated in the GDI group, reflecting greater richness in the latter. Notably, Rothia species commonly linked to sinus infections were enriched in the GZI group, suggesting sinus-associated microbiome alterations. Conclusion: Implant type significantly influences peri-implant microbiota composition. Zygomatic implants exhibit distinct microbial communities potentially associated with sinus involvement. Further studies are needed to clarify their role in peri-implant and sinus-related pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.