ArticleJournal of dental sciences2026
Domiciliary dental care coverage in Taiwan: An assessment of provider participation and geographic distribution using the universal health coverage framework.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Universal health coverage (UHC) ensures access to needed health services without financial hardship. While Taiwan has achieved near-universal coverage for most medical services, domiciliary dental care (DDC) for people with mobility limitations remains poorly integrated into the UHC framework. This study assessed DDC coverage in Taiwan using the World Health Organization UHC framework. Materials and methods: Publicly available 2024 data were analyzed for dental institutions, practicing dentists, DDC providers, and long-term care populations across Taiwan's six National Health Insurance (NHI) regions and 22 administrative districts. Geographic distribution was examined using provider density metrics, Lorenz curves, and Gini coefficients. Results: Among 7560 dental institutions, only 102 (1.3 %) provided DDC services, while 163 of 16,690 dentists (1.0 %) participated. Of 892,117 people who required long-term care, 23,379 (2.6 %) received DDC services. DDC represented 3.1 % of special needs dental services budget utilization. Geographic distribution demonstrated excellent equity with Gini coefficients of 0.064-0.082 and Lorenz curves above the equality line, indicating pro-rural distribution. However, service provision varied substantially: three districts had zero coverage, regional participation ranged from 0.5 % to 4.1 %, and provider density ranged from 0.7 to 3.9 per 10,000 people requiring care. Conclusion: Despite comprehensive financial protection and equitable geographic distribution, critically low provider participation creates severe supply constraints that prevent most people requiring long-term care from accessing domiciliary oral health services. Taiwan has achieved equity in DDC distribution but not adequacy of supply, revealing substantial gaps in UHC achievement for vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.