ArticleJournal of dental sciences2026
Prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after tooth extraction by local administration of antibiotics and atelocollagen sponge: A preliminary study.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) often develops after extraction of a tooth with a local infection. Therefore, it is necessary to develop extraction methods that can prevent MRONJ. Before examining whether antibiotics and atelocollagen administered in the extraction socket can prevent the development of MRONJ after tooth extraction, this study was conducted to determine the appropriate antibiotics concentration and to conduct a clinical study with a small number of cases as a preliminary study. Materials and methods: First, a mixture of minocycline and atelocollagen at different concentrations was implanted into the bone cavity formed in the rabbit head, and the local minocycline concentration was measured after 24 and 48 h. Next, the incidences of MRONJ after tooth extraction in patients receiving high-dose antiresorptive agents were compared between the atelocollagen and atelocollagen/minocycline mixture groups. A group that did not undergo transplantation was also compared as a historical control. Results: In animal studies, a mixture of 10 mg/ml minocycline injected into collagen and implanted into the bone cavity showed sufficiently high antimicrobial concentrations, even after 48 h. Post-extraction MRONJ occurred in 3 of the 13 control groups (23.1%), 3 of the 13 atelocollagen groups (23.1%), and 1 of the 13 atelocollagen/minocycline groups (7.7%). Conclusion: Atelocollagen functions as a carrier for retaining antibiotics for a certain period. Although this was a study with a limited number of cases, it suggested that the local administration of atelocollagen/minocycline in the extraction socket may reduce the risk of MRONJ following tooth extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.