Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585079›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2025

Role of minimally invasive surgery in paediatric pulmonary metastatic disease.

Timothy B Lautz, Rodrigo Chaves Ribeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timothy B LautzDivision of Paediatric Surgery, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Rodrigo Chaves RibeiroDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Children's Cancer Hospital, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784058, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in paediatric pulmonary metastasectomy is evolving, reflecting advances in imaging, localisation and instrumentation. Compared with thoracotomy, thoracoscopy offers benefits of reduced postoperative pain, shorter recovery and easier reoperation. However, limitations include anaesthetic challenges in smaller children and lack of manual palpation, which may miss subpleural nodules, which is particularly important in chemoresistant tumours such as osteosarcoma and nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma. MIS is most suitable for limited disease, peripheral nodules and histologies where complete manual exploration is unnecessary. Indications depend on tumour type, number and location of lesions, as well as patient stability and institutional expertise. Advances in nodule localization-such as wire or coil marking, fluorescence imaging and radiotracers-have improved thoracoscopic precision. Wedge resection remains preferred for peripheral nodules, with anatomic resection reserved for central or larger lesions. MIS contraindications include extensive disease, inability to tolerate single-lung ventilation or lack of required resources. Optimal outcomes depend on experienced multidisciplinary teams and readiness to convert to open surgery when needed. Overall, thoracoscopy is a safe, effective option in selected paediatric patients, providing therapeutic benefit while minimising morbidity when applied judiciously to tumour biology and disease extent.

Indexed as

childrenpulmonary metastasectomythoracoscopythoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID41585079
PMCPMC12826777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.