ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Focal Aneurysm Wall Enhancement in Vessel Wall Imaging as a Surrogate Marker for Predicting Aneurysm Instability.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aneurysm Wall Enhancement and Probability of Instability in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Appearance and Disappearance of Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Enhancement during Follow-Up: A Multicenter Cohort Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- There Is Poor Agreement between the Subjective and Quantitative Adjudication of Aneurysm Wall Enhancement.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Emergency microsurgical trapping, decompression, and revascularization of a middle cerebral artery dissecting aneurysm using a minipterional approach in a pediatric patient: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The establishment of a risk stratification method for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) remains an interdisciplinary challenge. The present study attempted to identify unstable UIAs using magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging in prospective data sets. Hemodynamic parameters in unstable UIAs were also examined to clarify the mechanisms by which segmented aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) affects longitudinal morphological changes. Methods: Patients with UIAs who underwent contrast-enhanced vessel wall imaging between 2017 and 2022 and were followed up for more than 6 months were included. Two readers independently rated AWE patterns (no, focal, and circumferential AWE) on vessel wall imaging and morphological changes on time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Computational fluid dynamics studies were performed on unstable UIAs to evaluate the hemodynamic features of evolved or ruptured points in aneurysm walls. Results: Aneurysm growth was observed in 13 of 114 UIAs in the present study during a median follow-up of 34 months. Of the 13 growing UIAs, their AWE patterns were as follows: no AWE in 6 and focal AWE (FAWE) in 7 UIAs. Univariable Cox regression analysis showed that aneurysm size and FAWE were associated with aneurysm growth. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, FAWE (hazard ratio, 4.59 [95% CI, 1.29-16.3]; Conclusion: FAWE may be associated with aneurysm growth and rupture during follow-up. A comprehensive analysis of nonenhanced areas of UIAs with FAWE using vessel wall imaging and computational fluid dynamics provides insights into the mechanisms underlying aneurysm instability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.