Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585049›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Endovascular Treatment in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke: A Brief Practice Update From the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology.

Kaiz S Asif, Robin Novakovic, Thanh N Nguyen, Ossama Mansour, Adam deHavenon, Hesham E Masoud, Alicia C Castonguay, Cynthia Kenmuir, Yazan Ashouri, Vallabh Janardhan and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Endovascular Treatment for Basilar Artery Occlusion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kaiz S AsifNeuroscience Institute, Neuro-endovascular Section Ascension Health, and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois Chicago IL USA.
Robin NovakovicDepartments of Radiology, and Neurology UT Southwestern Dallas TX.
Thanh N NguyenNeurology, Radiology, Boston Medical Center Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine Boston MA.
Ossama MansourStroke and Neurointervention Section, Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
Adam deHavenonDepartment of Neurology Yale University New Haven CT.
Hesham E MasoudDepartments of Neurology, Neurosurgery Radiology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse New York NY.
Alicia C CastonguayDepartment of Neurology University of Toledo Toledo OH.
Cynthia KenmuirDepartment of Neurology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA.
Yazan AshouriNeuroscience Program Bon Secours Mercy Health St. Vincent Hospital Toledo OH.
Vallabh JanardhanMedical City Plano Plano TX USA.
David S LiebeskindUCLA Stroke Center Los Angeles CA.
Ameer E HassanDepartment of Neurology, Valley Baptist Medical Center University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Harlingen TX USA.
Amer M MalikDepartment of Neurology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami FL.
Osama O ZaidatNeuroscience and Stroke Program Bon Secours Mercy Health St. Vincent Hospital Toledo OH.
SVIN GAPS Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Guidelines and Practice Standards committee established the "Brief Practice Update" format to provide up-to-date recommendations on focused relevant clinical questions. In this Brief Practice Update, we review current evidence and provide recommendations for endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute large-vessel occlusion of the basilar artery. Methods: The Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Guidelines and Practice Standards committee conducted a systematic review, including the recent randomized clinical trials of EVT for acute ischemic stroke attributable to basilar artery occlusion, and summarized relevant data to provide recommendations for clinical practice. The Guidelines and Practice Standards quality committee reviewed the findings to ensure adherence to the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology internal evidence evaluation guidelines before review by the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology board members for societal endorsement. Results: Evidence favors EVT for basilar artery occlusion in comparison to medical management alone in patients with moderate to severe stroke. We formulated the level of evidence and the class of recommendation in the context of 5 clinical questions. Conclusions: In this brief practice statement, we share general recommendations on EVT for acute ischemic stroke attributable to large-vessel occlusion of the basilar artery. Recent randomized controlled trials, Basilar Artery Occlusion Chinese Endovascular (BAOCHE) trial and Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar-Artery Occlusion (ATTENTION), and a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials support EVT in patients with moderate to severe basilar artery occlusion stroke symptoms.

Indexed as

basilar arteryinterventionalpracticestrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID41585049
PMCPMC12778725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.