Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585030›Full record

ArticleBiochar2026

Harnessing peatland rewetting for effective biochar-based carbon dioxide removal.

Jennifer M Rhymes, Niall P McNamara, Davey L Jones, Fabrizio Albanito, Chris D Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer M RhymesUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor, LL57 2UW UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9347-9863
Niall P McNamaraUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, LA14 AP UK.
Davey L JonesSchool of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW UK.
Fabrizio AlbanitoUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor, LL57 2UW UK.
Chris D EvansUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor, LL57 2UW UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochar is widely recognised as a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technology, but its stability depends on feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, and the soil environment. Current CDR schemes prioritise highly stable biochars to ensure long-term permanence, requiring high pyrolysis temperatures that reduce carbon yield and intensify competition for biomass. This perspective explores potential synergies between two distinct CDR approaches, biochar application and peatland rewetting, where rewetted peatlands could enhance biochar permanence by suppressing microbial decomposition, offering a means to improve both carbon retention and resource efficiency. Using decomposition rate modifiers from biogeochemical models, we estimate biochar stability in rewetted peat and assess its CDR efficiency relative to a counterfactual of high-stability biochar application to dry soils. This perspective suggests that rewetted peatlands significantly reduce biochar carbon losses, particularly for lower-stability biochars, making them more viable for long-term CDR. By allowing greater flexibility in biochar selection, this approach could improve the scalability of biochar deployment while alleviating biomass supply constraints. While challenges such as land-use transitions and methane emissions must be addressed, integrating biochar with peatland rewetting presents a high-impact strategy to optimise the efficiency of biomass-based CDR. Graphical Abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42773-025-00524-5.

Indexed as

Biochar stabilityCO2 removalNegative emissions technologyPeatland restorationRewetting

Identifiers

PMID41585030
PMCPMC12827367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.