Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585005›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2026

The accuracy of 2 clinically used techniques and a pressure tip catheter for measuring intravesicular pressure in a canine cadaveric model of intra-abdominal hypertension.

Elroy V Williams, Jennifer M Loewen, Mateo O Castano, James C Colee, Anthony P Carr, Cindy Shmon

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elroy V WilliamsDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 (Williams, Loewen, Castano, Carr, Shmon); Statistics Division, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0180, USA (Colee).

Jennifer M LoewenDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 (Williams, Loewen, Castano, Carr, Shmon); Statistics Division, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0180, USA (Colee).

Mateo O CastanoDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 (Williams, Loewen, Castano, Carr, Shmon); Statistics Division, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0180, USA (Colee).

James C ColeeDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 (Williams, Loewen, Castano, Carr, Shmon); Statistics Division, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0180, USA (Colee).

Anthony P CarrDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 (Williams, Loewen, Castano, Carr, Shmon); Statistics Division, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0180, USA (Colee).

Cindy ShmonDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 (Williams, Loewen, Castano, Carr, Shmon); Statistics Division, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0180, USA (Colee).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When persistent or severe, intra-abdominal hypertension can evolve into abdominal compartment syndrome if timely therapeutic intervention is not rendered. Such interventions rely heavily on dependable, accurate monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure. The most reliable way to monitor intra-abdominal pressure in small animals is by indirectly measuring intravesicular pressure. The objective of this study was to compare the water manometry, external pressure transducer (ExtT), and pressure tip catheter techniques for their accuracy in measuring intravesicular pressure against a known intra-abdominal pressure. We hypothesized that the water manometry technique would be more accurate than the external pressure transducer (ExtT) technique in a canine cadaveric model and that pressure tip catheter would be the most accurate of the 3. Each technique was carried out on 22 small-breed canine cadavers in a randomized order, with incremental increases in insufflation pressure

Indexed as

CatheterizationCathetersDog DiseasesIntra-Abdominal HypertensionManometryAnimalsCadaverDogsPressure

Identifiers

PMID41585005

PMCPMC12825808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.