Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584994›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2026

Validation of simulator-based neuroangiographical training.

Elle Vermeulen, Ramon Torné, Ebba Katsler, Nuri Alioski, Mihail Petrov, Teodora Sakelarova, Leire Pedrosa, Torstein Ragnar Meling, Nikolay Velinov, Hieronymus Damianus Boogaarts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elle VermeulenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Jette, Belgium.
Ramon TornéDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Ebba KatslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital of Denmark (Rigshospitalet), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nuri AlioskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, "Saint Anna" Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Mihail PetrovDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment with Emergency Medicine "N. I. Pirogov", Sofia, Bulgaria.
Teodora SakelarovaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment with Emergency Medicine "N. I. Pirogov", Sofia, Bulgaria.
Leire PedrosaInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Torstein Ragnar MelingDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital of Denmark (Rigshospitalet), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nikolay VelinovDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment with Emergency Medicine "N. I. Pirogov", Sofia, Bulgaria.
Hieronymus Damianus BoogaartsDepartment of Neurosurgery. Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Angiography is a diagnostic and interventional technique in (endo)vascular neurosurgery that demands a high level of precision and technical expertise. Traditionally, mastery of angiographic techniques has relied on hands-on training, often limited by patient availability and procedural complexity. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of simulator-based training for angiography, determining its role in enhancing procedural proficiency and its potential integration into a neuroendovascular training curriculum. Research question: Is a simulator-based training for neuroangiography effective ? Materials and methods: Participants (22 trainees and 10 experts) were recruited in neurosurgical departments from four international university hospitals. After a familiarization session, each participant performed 6 attempts of diagnostic angiography and 3 attempts of coiling on an Angio mentor endovascular simulator. Data gathered were procedure time, fluoroscopy time, amount of contrast injected, number of roadmap sequences and number of errors. The learning curve was studied and contrasting group assessment was performed. Results: There was a clear steep improvement for all parameters in the learning curve which flattens out as the trainees master angiography and coiling. Trainees had a notable reduction in procedure time, approaching the experts' levels after sixth and seventh attempt of diagnostic angiography. The contrasting group assessment demonstrated discriminating results of experts compared to trainees and a distinctly increasing overlap between trainees and experts with increasing number of attempts. Discussion and conclusions: Endovascular simulators enable skill acquisition in a controlled environment, enhancing technical proficiency in neuroendovascular coiling and angiography, and should play a role in neuroendovascular training.

Indexed as

AngiographyNeurosurgical trainingSimulator

Identifiers

PMID41584994
PMCPMC12828531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.