Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584990›Full record

ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Functional Arterial Anatomy of the Cranial Base.

Takahiro Ota

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Revised concept of rete-like collateral formation:Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Preoperative Embolization for Tentorial and Subtentorial Tumors.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Are orbital branches of the middle meningeal artery underestimated? A human cadaveric angiographic study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Takahiro OtaDepartment of Neurosurgery Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5108-6719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two main vascular routes supply the brain, internal carotid arteries (ICAs) and vertebral arteries. The external carotid artery (ECA) mainly supplies the skin, muscle, and skull; thus, neurointerventionalists should be aware of ECA-ICA, ECA-vertebral artery, and extracranial-intracranial anastomoses. These anastomoses are not newly formed but are arteries that are remnants of developmental processes. During development, the ICA has anastomoses with the original ECA at the first and second pharyngeal arches, and carotid-basilar anastomoses exist between the ICA and vertebral artery/basilar artery. Advances in neurointerventional technology are increasingly expanding the indications for transarterial embolization in the ECA territory. To avoid embolic complications to the brain and cranial nerve palsy, knowledge and understanding of such extracranial-intracranial anastomosis are crucial for neurointerventionalists interested in neurovascular diseases. The arterial contributions to these anastomoses are mainly the branches of the maxillary artery, ascending pharyngeal artery (extracranial), ophthalmic artery, and branches of the ICA (intracranial). Knowledge of the embryological processes is essential for understanding the routes and patterns of these anastomoses. This review discusses ECA development, the ICA segmental concept and functional anatomy of the extracranial-intracranial anastomoses in the orbit, cavernous sinus, petrosal bone, and posterior fossa from an embryological point of view.

Indexed as

cerebral arterycranial basedangerous anastomosisembryologyexternal carotid arteryfunctional anatomy

Identifiers

PMID41584990
PMCPMC12778641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.