ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Transferring Patients From a Primary Stroke Center to Higher Levels of Care: A Qualitative Study of Stroke Coordinators' Experiences.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mothership Versus Drip-and-Ship Models in Acute Stroke Care: A Time-Sensitive Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Pooled it
- Optimal Head-of-Bed Positioning Before Thrombectomy in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2025Trial
- Natural language processing for triage of cerebral large-vessel occlusion.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transfer times from primary stroke centers and acute stroke-ready hospitals to higher levels of care are often excessive, prompting some to suggest ambulance bypass regulations. Since barriers to rapid transfer have never been fully explored, we sought to understand stroke coordinators' experiences with transfer of patients with hyperacute stroke from lower to higher levels of stroke centers. Methods: We conducted a national focus group study with primary stroke center stroke coordinators who had recent experience overseeing transfer of a patient with hyperacute stroke to a higher-level stroke center. Interviews were conducted using prescripted open-ended questions; information was recorded and data were transcribed for theme identification. Results: A total of 23 stroke coordinators participated representing the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, Midwest, and Western United States. Findings were grouped into 3 main categories: Internal Primary Stroke Center Factors, Transport Factors, and External Comprehensive Stroke Center Factors. Within the primary stroke center group, themes slowing transfer were exclusively physician based, whereas themes emerging from the transport category were associated with poor transport company processes. Within the comprehensive stroke center category, themes were all associated with complex hospital processes and communication. Conclusion: Important contributors to efficient transfer of patients with hyperacute stroke are beyond the control of stroke coordinators, requiring cross-system collaboration and improved administrative management to resolve. Quantification of these factors is warranted to support transfer system redesign for rapid access to care for patients with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.