Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584927›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2025

Reconstructing developmental lineages: a retrospective approach using somatic mutations and variant allele frequency.

Mahnoor Sajjad, Seong Gyu Kwon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mahnoor SajjadDepartment of Anatomy and Convergence Medical Science, College of Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Seong Gyu KwonDepartment of Anatomy and Convergence Medical Science, College of Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic mutations accumulate during the first zygotic division and continue throughout an organism's lifespan. The characteristics and frequency of these mutations are contingent on developmental timing and tissue type, giving rise to somatic mosaicism, defined as the presence of unique genomic alterations across different cells. They serve as endogenous cellular barcodes, enabling detailed reconstruction of cell lineages and clonal dynamics. Although lineage tracing techniques have advanced from early microscopic observation and dye staining to the introduction of artificial barcodes via gene editing, owing to ethical considerations, such genetic manipulations in human developmental research are unavailable. Therefore, spontaneously arising somatic mutations are the most suitable strategy for tracing human lineages. Current approaches can be broadly categorized into two strategies: (i) high-resolution methods, including single-cell clonal expansion or laser-capture microdissection, which construct precise phylogenetic trees based on shared mutation profiles; and (ii) bulk sequencing methods, which infer lineage proximity by comparing variant allele frequencies across samples. As more lineage-tracing studies are being conducted focusing on a wider variety of organs, the integration of such data will make it possible to discover the general principles governing human development. This review highlights how the concept of somatic mutations has been applied across diverse biological contexts and discusses the insights and common principles that can be drawn from these findings.

Indexed as

embryogenesislineage tracinglineage treesomatic mutationvariant allele frequency (VAF)whole-genome sequencing (WGS)

Identifiers

PMID41584927
PMCPMC12826601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.