ReviewInternational journal of transgender health2026
Mental health practitioners' perspectives on supporting transgender and gender diverse youth: A scoping review.
Review in International journal of transgender health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gender diverse (GD) youth face unique stressors that result in disproportionate mental health challenges compared to their peers. Although mental healthcare is a crucial resource for addressing these challenges, GD youth often report negative experiences, leading to avoidance of services and worsening distress. Understanding mental health practitioners (MHPs) perspectives of supporting GD youth is important for improving their capacity to deliver appropriate, supportive care. Aim: The aim of this review is to scope and consolidate evidence on the perspectives of MHPs in their work with GD youth. Methods: PsycINFO, Scopus, PubMed, Proquest dissertations and theses, and Google Scholar were searched between March-April 2024 for English language primary research of any study design, including peer-reviewed articles and theses/dissertations. Thematic synthesis was used to consolidate the findings of 23 included studies. Results: Six interrelated themes were constructed: (i) perceived lack of availability and utility of GD education and training; (ii) limited knowledge and preparedness for practice; (iii) navigating uncertainty and adapting therapeutic approaches; (iv) the need for multilevel care addressing individual, relational, and systemic needs; (v) providing safety and affirmation, and challenging deficit narratives; and (vi) emotional, ethical, and value-based challenges in supporting GD youth. Conclusions: There is a need for GD training and evidence-based guidelines for MHPs for working with GD youth and their families. Some MHPs provided safety and acceptance to GD youth, while others experienced conflicted personal and professional values. MHPs may benefit from critical reflection and clinical supervision to navigate challenges associated with their role supporting GD youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.