Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584910›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean gerontological nursing2023

[Practice and improvement plans of the tailored dementia case management in local dementia centers: A qualitative study using focus group].

Jiyeon Kim, Jun-Ah Song, Sua Jung, Jiyeon Kim, Sunhee Kim

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean gerontological nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: With the nationwide expansion of local dementia centers (LDCs) after the National Responsibility for Dementia System, the number of tailored dementia case management (TDCM) programs increased significantly, but qualitative improvement in TDCM is still a remaining task. The purpose of this study was to explore the current practice of the TDCM in LDCs and suggest directions for future program improvement. Methods: A focus group interview was conducted with seven hands-on workers who had experience in TDCM at the LDCs. Participants (mean age=40 years old) were nurses, social worker, and occupational therapist with an average of 9.1 years of working experience in TDCM. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: The results were summarized into three core themes and fourteen sub-themes. The three core themes were 'Job Characteristics of TDCM,' 'Barriers to the effective operation of TDCM,' and 'Improvement plans for successful TDCM.' Conclusion: To establish the function and role of TDCM within the domestic dementia management system, we propose five areas for improvement: 1) Developing a standardized TDCM manual; 2) Quantitative and qualitative expansion of case manager working capacity; 3) Activating a multidisciplinary team approach; 4) Forming a collaborative network between related organizations and local community councils; 5) Active promotion of TDCM.

Indexed as

Case managementDementiaFocus groups

Identifiers

PMID41584910
PMCPMC12384313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.