ReviewFrontiers in big data2025
Bias in AI systems: integrating formal and socio-technical approaches.
Review in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI inclusivity and the centrality of Africa: a systematic review of representation, innovation, and governance in global artificial intelligence.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- AI-Driven Atrial Fibrillation Management: From Signal to Strategy.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
- The Design-Driven Innovation Path of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Healthcare: Theory, Practice, and Future Prospects.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly embedded in high-stakes decision-making across domains such as healthcare, finance, criminal justice, and employment. Evidence has been accumulated showing that these systems can reproduce and amplify structural inequities, leading to ethical, social, and technical concerns. In this review, formal mathematical definitions of bias are integrated with socio-technical perspectives to examine its origins, manifestations, and impacts. Bias is categorized into four interrelated families: historical/representational, selection/measurement, algorithmic/optimization, and feedback/emergent, and its operation is illustrated through case studies in facial recognition, large language models, credit scoring, healthcare, employment, and criminal justice. Current mitigation strategies are critically evaluated, including dataset diversification, fairness-aware modeling, post-deployment auditing, regulatory frameworks, and participatory design. An integrated framework is proposed in which statistical diagnostics are coupled with governance mechanisms to enable bias mitigation across the entire AI lifecycle. By bridging technical precision with sociological insight, guidance is offered for the development of AI systems that are equitable, accountable, and responsive to the needs of diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.