Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584898›Full record

ArticleJournal of transport & health2022

Impact of a Light Rail Transit Line on Physical Activity: Findings from the Longitudinal Travel Assessment and Community (TRAC) Study.

B E Saelens, P M Hurvitz, C Zhou, T Colburn, A J Marchese, A V Moudon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of transport & health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B E SaelensSeattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Avenue, Seattle, Washington USA 98101.
P M HurvitzUrban Form Lab, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535, Seattle, Washington USA 98105.
C ZhouSeattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Avenue, Seattle, Washington USA 98101.
T ColburnSeattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Avenue, Seattle, Washington USA 98101.
A J MarcheseSeattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Avenue, Seattle, Washington USA 98101.
A V MoudonUrban Form Lab, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535, Seattle, Washington USA 98105.

Funding

The effect of light rail transit on physical activity: a natural experimentR01HL091881 · NHLBI · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAELENS, BRIAN E · 2008 to 2012
$3.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing transit infrastructure could increase transit use and result in higher physical activity if users actively travel to access transit. Few studies have rigorously examined transit use and physical activity change from before to years after among residents living close versus farther away from new transit options. Methods: An initial sample (n=722) of residents living either close (<1 mile network distance; exposed) or farther away (>1 mile network distance; unexposed) from future new light rail transit (LRT) stops in the Seattle/King County area were recruited and assessed prior to LRT opening and again 1-2 and 3-4 years later. At each assessment timepoint, residents wore an accelerometer and GPS data logger for 7 days and completed a 7-day travel log and demographic and attitudinal survey. Difference-in-difference analyses examined longitudinal change between those exposed versus unexposed to LRT in physical activity, walking (both utilitarian and recreational), and transit-related walking, and transit use. Results: There was no differential change by LRT exposure in overall physical activity (including or not including light intensity physical activity), recreational walking, or utilitarian walking, with most decreasing significantly in both exposure conditions through follow-ups. There was a differential change in transit-related walking, with those exposed to LRT slightly increasing such physical activity to the most distal follow-up, but the difference from the unexposed condition was modest (<2 minutes/day). There was no substantial differential change over time in transit use by LRT exposure. Conclusions: Exposure to a new light rail line did not markedly change the frequency of transit use of nearby residents, but did result in a small increase in transit-related walking relative to those unexposed. This did not differentially change the amount of overall physical activity or time spent walking compared to residents living farther away from the new LRT.

Indexed as

public transportationtransitwalking

Identifiers

PMID41584898
PMCPMC12830045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.