ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Human and large language model judgments of cognitive impairment from language: An explainable artificial intelligence approach.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human and large language model judgments of cognitive impairment from language: An explainable artificial intelligence approach.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe examine how non-expert humans (young adults unfamiliar with dementia) and large language models (LLMs) perceive dementia in transcribed texts-recognizing signs that may indicate cognitive decline. Human perception is important, as it is often the driver for seeking medical evaluation. LLM perception is equally interesting given their potential as screening tools.
methodsHumans and LLMs intuitively judged whether transcribed picture descriptions came from dementia patients or healthy controls. We represented texts using high-level, expert-guided features and used logistic regression to model perceptions and analyze coefficients.
resultsHuman judgments are inconsistent, relying on a narrow and sometimes misleading set of cues. LLMs use a richer, more clinically aligned feature set. Both groups show a tendency toward false negatives. DISCUSSION: This work highlights the need to educate humans and LLMs to recognize a broader range of dementia-related linguistic signals. It also underscores the value of interpretability in dementia research. Highlights: Explainable artificial intelligence (AI) uncovers linguistic cues that humans and large language models (LLMs) associate with dementia.LLMs allow scalable extraction of expert-defined features on picture descriptions.LLMs use broader cues than humans to detect dementia and better align with diagnoses.Humans and LLMs exhibit false negatives; LLMs view fluency as cognitive health.Understanding non-expert perceptions can guide education and improve early awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.