ArticleNature water2026
Headwater streams control the non-perennial fraction of the global river network.
Article in Nature water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Headwater streams control the non-perennial fraction of the global river network.Nature water · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying the fraction of a river network that does not flow year-round is crucial, as the wetting and drying of channels governs important hydrological and biogeochemical services of watersheds. However, this remains challenging due to limited experimental data and the difficulty of accurately representing the total length of rivers draining a landscape. Here we present new global estimates of non-perennial stream fractions by extrapolating low-resolution global simulations and detailed field observations from experimental sites spanning diverse climatic settings. Our findings show that non-perennial streams are far more prevalent than previously recognized, both regionally and globally. When small headwater streams are comprehensively accounted for, the global fraction of non-perennial channels rises above 0.7 (up to 0.78), with regional estimates in relatively humid regions such as Italy and the eastern USA exceeding 0.5. The study reveals that, owing to the abundance of small upland streams, the effect of channel wetting and drying in headwaters persists even in much larger basins. The systematic prevalence of non-perennial streams across different watershed sizes calls for a paradigm shift in water science, emphasizing the importance of adequately considering channel network dynamics in the assessment of hydrological, ecological and societal services provided by rivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.