ArticleThe Urban review2026
An Evaluation of the Chicago Public Schools Gender Inclusivity Professional Learning Community for K-12 Teachers.
Article in The Urban review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An increasing number of K-12 public school students report holding lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, or asexual or aromantic (LGBTQIA+) identities. And, we know these students are at significantly higher risk of experiencing a variety of negative health outcomes, especially transgender and gender expansive students who are at greatest risk. That said, a strong evidence-base demonstrates that LGBTQIA+ students in schools with protective policies and inclusive curricula experience significantly improved outcomes. Some districts, like Chicago Public Schools (CPS), are implementing these evidence-based policies and programs to protect LGBTQIA+ students. Yet, there remain opportunities to grow and expand this work, including: (1) exploring models for professional development that best equip teachers with the skills needed to implement these programs and policies; and (2) identifying more ways that curricula, including science curricula, can be inclusive. With these opportunities in mind, CPS launched a Gender Inclusivity Professional Learning Community (GI PLC) in 2022 with 7 participants. This case study describes how the GI PLC functioned to support teacher learning and how teachers developed projects, including curricula, that they took back to their classrooms. In 2023, 10 interviews were conducted with PLC facilitators (N = 4), participants (N = 5), and a technical assistance provider (N = 1). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using MaxQDA qualitative data analysis software. Key findings revealed that participants reported value in terms of learning and community-building. The aims and content of the projects that participants developed within the GI PLC were aligned with: understanding students' identities at an individual level; developing inclusive curricula at a classroom level; and leading policy implementation at the school level. The GI PLC can be a model for other districts working to support LGBTQIA+ students through curricula and engaging in multi-level change approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.