ArticlePeerJ2026
Clinical outcomes with first-line tislelizumab plus lenvatinib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CyberKnife SBRT plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus doublet systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A real-world IPTW-adjusted study.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This retrospective analysis aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy and adverse event profile of tislelizumab combined with lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), predominantly of hepatitis B virus (HBV) etiology. While this combination has shown promise in clinical trials, real-world data in HBV-endemic populations remain sparse. Methods: A total of 163 uHCC patients who initiated first-line systemic therapy with tislelizumab and lenvatinib between January 2021 and February 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment response was evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Key clinical endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), treatment-emergent adverse events (TRAEs), and other relevant outcomes. Prognostic factors were explored through subgroup analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Of the 163 patients (84.7% HBV-related), the ORR was 25.8%, DCR was 67.5%, and median PFS was 13.87 months. Additionally, 16.6% of patients achieved conversion therapy and subsequent surgical resection. Subgroup and multivariate analyses indicated that a larger tumor burden, particularly tumors ≥5 cm, was associated with shorter PFS but did not significantly affect OS. TRAEs were observed in 86% of patients, with grade ≥3 events occurring in 5%. Conclusions: This analysis supports that tislelizumab plus lenvatinib provides substantial clinical benefit in HBV-related uHCC, including potential for conversion to surgical resection. Tumor burden emerged as a key predictor of progression. The regimen demonstrated a favorable safety profile, reinforcing its potential as a frontline treatment in HBV-endemic areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.