ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2026
Evaluation of the porosity and structural stability of 3D-printed porous titanium pedicle screws using finite element analysis.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Research into the spinal biomechanics of 3D-printed porous titanium pedicle screws (3DPS) has not yet been undertaken. This study evaluates the structural performance of 3DPS under physiological loading conditions using finite element analysis (FEA) and analyzes the effects of varying porosity levels on their mechanical behavior. Method: A validated FE model of the lumbar spine was used to simulate one-, two-, and three-level fusion scenarios with 3DPS and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages. Physiological loads, including flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, were applied. Peak von Mises stress (PVMS), stress distribution, and structural stability were assessed across the different porosity configurations (0%, 60%, 70%, and 80%). Result: The PVMS value in the core increases as the porosity increases. the stress distribution of posterior fixations in a 3-level fusion. when the porosity of the porous layer was 80%, the stress was concentrated in the core. At 70% and 80% porosity, where the risk of structural instability exceeded safe thresholds under a conservative safety factor of 3. The 60% porosity demonstrated an optimal balance between mechanical stability and stress distribution. Conclusion: 3DPS, particularly those with 60% porosity, offer promising potential for enhancing fixation stability. Further studies are needed to confirm their long-term clinical efficacy. The outcomes of this research offer a critical preliminary step for preclinical and clinical evaluations aimed at confirming the mechanical integrity of 3D-printed porous structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.