Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584783›Full record

ReviewAnnals of vascular diseases2026

Machine Learning and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A New Paradigm in Prediction and Prognosis after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Toshiya Nishibe, Tsuyoshi Iwasa, Shoji Fukuda, Tomohiro Nakajima, Shinichiro Shimura, Masayasu Nishibe, Alan Dardik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of vascular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Toshiya NishibeDepartment of Medical Informatics and Management, Hokkaido Information University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tsuyoshi IwasaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Management, Hokkaido Information University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shoji FukudaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro NakajimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shinichiro ShimuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayasu NishibeDepartment of Surgery, Eniwa Midorino Clinic, Eniwa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Alan DardikDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are transforming vascular surgery by enabling precise risk stratification, individualized treatment planning, and improved prognostic prediction. In abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) management, ML algorithms integrate complex clinical and imaging data to estimate survival, guide procedural decisions, and identify key factors influencing aneurysm remodeling. These models outperform traditional statistical approaches by capturing nonlinear interactions among variables such as nutritional status, immune function, and anatomical features. Despite these advances, challenges remain. Many studies rely on single-center datasets, raising concerns about overfitting and limited generalizability. The use of black-box models can hinder clinical trust due to limited interpretability. However, recent developments in multicenter data collection and explainable AI techniques are improving model robustness and transparency. As these tools continue to evolve, ML is poised to contribute meaningfully to precision vascular care. By supporting more individualized and data-informed decision-making, ML has the potential to enhance long-term outcomes and guide the future of AAA management after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Indexed as

abdominal aortic aneurysmartificial intelligenceendovascular aneurysm repairmachine learningprognosis

Identifiers

PMID41584783
PMCPMC12826844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.