ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2022
Transradial Access Results in Faster Recanalization in Left Anterior Circulation Stroke with Bovine Arch Anatomy.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ulnar artery access for intracranial mechanical thrombectomy procedure: A salvage option after failed trans-femoral and trans-radial access.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Endovascular Thrombectomy of Left Anterior Circulation Stroke With Bovine Arch.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Nexfin versus conventional oscillometric cuff for blood pressure monitoring during neuro-endovascular procedures.Brain circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We compared technical and clinical outcomes of transradial (TRA) versus transfemoral (TFA) access for mechanical thrombectomy of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the left anterior cerebral circulation of bovine origin. Methods: A single-center retrospective review of a prospectively maintained neurointerventional database from a large volume service in a tertiary academic center. Procedural metrics, technical, and clinical outcomes data were collected and analyzed for patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy presenting with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion in the left anterior circulation of bovine origin. Clinical and procedural outcomes included the average number of passes, single first effective pass, rate of successful recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score≥2b), 3-month disability modified Rankin scale scores, time from skin puncture to microcatheter placement, and recanalization. Results: Between January 2018 and January 2021, 26 patients (TRA=13, TFA=13) underwent mechanical thrombectomy. The TRA cohort had a significantly shorter time in minutes for skin puncture to microcatheter placement (TRA: 17.0±5.8 versus TFA: 35.4±20.5; Conclusions: In patients with large vessel occlusion in the left anterior cerebral circulation of bovine origin, right TRA access permits more direct navigation and provides a stable platform resulting in shorter procedure times and faster recanalization with potential for improved functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.