ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2022
Modern Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Models: A Review.
Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding brain arteriovenous malformations: from genetic insights to modeling the vascular maze.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Review
- Mechanistically driven transnidal hemodynamic manipulations enhance simulated endovascular transvenous treatments for brain AVMs.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Cerebrovascular morphology: Insights into normal variations, aging effects and disease implications.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research of William Hunter's hypothesized (then discovered) arteriovenous varix (now arteriovenous malformation [AVM]) has developed exponentially over the previous quarter-millennium. Virchow and Luschka's subsequent contributions (nearly 100 years later) by identifying an AVM of the brain and its congenital nature were 2 of the first significant developments made in the field. AVMs present as an erroneous connection (known as a fistula) between an artery and a vein that bypasses the capillary circulation. The arteries and arterioles contributing to the malformation are known as feeders which connect to the draining veins via a plexiform vascular network known as a nidus. Prior to the design of a synthetic anastomosis coupled with vessel ligation by Spetzler et al, animal models were largely based on embolization or study of the normal anatomy. The animal and early genetic models have been reported on at length and numerous times across the literature, but novel developments spanning the previous decade have ushered in a technological revolution of vascular modeling that warrants discussion and analysis. Methods: Parameterization of a PubMed query to include all literature including the words "brain," "arteriovenous malformation," and "model" yielded 489 articles. After extraction of relevant literature and full-text screening, 41 articles were chosen for detailed review. Results: Technological innovations outside of neurosurgery have greatly impacted the development of novel AVM models in the form of 3D flow models printed into silicon models and combined with advanced imaging technology such as 4D flow magnetic resonance imagin. Technological developments in preservation solutions, catheterization tools, and imaging technologies have also allowed for advent of the cerebrovascular placental model for testing of treatments such as radiosurgery, glue embolization, coiling, as well as histological assessment of tissue directly after intervention. Conclusion: We review the breadth of AVM models in the literature over the last almost 5 decades.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.