ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2022
Association of the 24-Hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale After Mechanical Thrombectomy With Early and Long-Term Survival.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a simple clinical score to predict early neurological improvement after mechanical thrombectomy: a single-centre cohort study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Impact of Carotid Artery Tortuosity on Technical Aspects of Endovascular Thrombectomy in a Newly Established Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Center.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Predictor Role ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Impact of war on stroke incidence in Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Lifetime and Acute Stress Predict Functional Outcomes Following Stroke: Findings From the Longitudinal STRONG Study.Stroke · 2023Article
- Predictors of failure of early neurological improvement in early time window following endovascular thrombectomy: a multi-center study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) obtained 24 hours after ischemic stroke is a good indicator for functional outcome and early mortality, but the correlation with long-term survival is less clear. We analyzed the correlation of the NIHSS after 24 hours (24h NIHSS) and early clinical neurological development after mechanical thrombectomy with early and long-term survival as well as its predictive power on survival. Methods: We reviewed a prospective observational registry for all patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy between January 2010 and December 2018. Vital status was extracted from the Swiss Population Registry. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and crude hazard ratios were calculated using Cox regression. To assess predictive power of the 24h NIHSS, different Random Survival Forest models were evaluated. Results: We included 957 patients (median follow-up 1376 days). Patients with lower 24h NIHSS and major early neurological improvement had substantially better survival rates. We observed significantly higher aHR for death in patients with 24h NIHSS 12 to 15 (aHR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.1-2.89), with 24h NIHSS 16 to 21 (aHR, 2.54, 95% CI, 1.59-4.06), and with 24h NIHSS >21 (aHR, 5.74; 95% CI, 3.47-9.5). The 24h NIHSS showed the best performance predicting mortality (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve at 3 months [0.85±0.034], at 1 year [0.82±0.029], at 2 years [0.82±0.031], and at 5 years [0.83±0.035]), followed by NIHSS change. Conclusions: Patients with acute ischemic stroke achieving a low 24h NIHSS or major early neurological improvement after mechanical thrombectomy had markedly lower long-term mortality. Furthermore, 24h NIHSS had the best predictive power for early and long-term survival in our machine learning-based prediction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.