ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Generic group metacognitive therapy for depression in specialized mental health care: an open trial with 6- and 12-month follow-ups.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Group metacognitive therapy for students with anxiety: an uncontrolled pre-post study of feasibility and associated outcomes.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Depression is the most prevalent mental disorder and a common cause for seeking treatment in specialist mental health care settings. Along with having a broad negative impact on general functioning, depression is frequently comorbid with other mental disorders and can, in many presentations, be complex to treat, with substantial relapse rates following treatment. Metacognitive therapy (MCT) aims to modify common determinants of distress to improve mental regulation, making it a transdiagnostic treatment well suited for delivery in a group format. Methods: In the present study, we evaluated the treatment effects associated with the generic group MCT in a Norwegian Specialist Mental Health Service for patients in need of treatment for depression. Diagnostic evaluation was conducted by independent assessors pre- and post-treatment, and patients self-reported on a range of measures pre-, post-treatment, and at six- and 12-month follow-ups. Results: Twenty patients divided into four groups received group MCT delivered by two therapists over 10 sessions. The treatment was associated with an 80% recovery rate from depression and large effects across primary and secondary outcomes, including return to work. From post-treatment through the six- and twelve-month follow-ups, the improvements were largely maintained, but a few patients reported a clinically significant increase in depression symptoms. A health economic evaluation indicated that the treatment was cost effective. Discussion: These findings suggest that generic group MCT is well-suited for specialist mental health care services aiming to treat depression cost-effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.