ReviewJTO clinical and research reports2026
Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Evolving Insights and Innovative Approaches.
Review in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct Molecular Pathways Driving Thymic and Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Organ of Origin Defines Molecular Identity and Yields CD44 as a Marker of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors.Endocrine pathology · 2026Article
- Thymic neuroendocrine tumours: molecular landscape, immune microenvironment and therapeutic perspectives.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNENs) are exceptionally rare and a clinically heterogeneous malignancy, often diagnosed at an advanced stage and lacking standardized treatment algorithms. Due to the scarcity of dedicated evidence, most therapeutic strategies are extrapolated from other neuroendocrine neoplasms. Methods: This narrative review provides an updated overview of current and emerging treatment approaches for TNENs, focusing on histology-driven strategies and the evolving role of targeted and radionuclide therapies. A comprehensive literature search was conducted through PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase from January 1, 2000, up to May 31, 2025, integrating retrospective series, real-world data, and ongoing clinical trials. Results: Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment whenever feasible. The benefit of adjuvant therapy in well-differentiated tumors is unclear, whereas thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas often require multimodal approaches, including platinum-etoposide chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Retrospective evidence suggests that even well-differentiated, high-grade tumors may respond to cytotoxic agents. Somatostatin analogues are widely used in indolent or peptide receptor-positive tumors, whereas everolimus and, more recently, cabozantinib represent options for progressive disease. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has demonstrated encouraging results in somatostatin receptor-positive tumors and is currently under further investigation in prospective trials involving thymic primaries. However, the 5-year overall survival rate varies significantly (approximately 28%-80%), underlining an urgent need for prospective, subtype-specific studies. Conclusions: The management of TNENs requires a multidisciplinary and individualized approach based on histologic subtype, somatostatin receptor status, and disease aggressiveness. Despite promising therapeutic options, robust prospective data remain limited. The integration of TNENs into basket trials, the molecular refinement of prognostic subgroups (e.g., NET G3), and the conduct of dedicated multicenter prospective studies are urgently needed to define optimal treatment algorithms and improve clinical outcomes in these rare entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.