Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584721›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2026

The Landscape of CEACAM5 Expression by Immunohistochemistry in NSCLC.

Ying-Han R Hsu, Amna Almutrafi, Katrina Hueniken, Alhareth Azaizeh, Likun Hou, Quan Li, Mackenzie Bates, Nhu-An Pham, Ming-Sound Tsao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying-Han R HsuUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amna AlmutrafiUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Katrina HuenikenUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alhareth AzaizehUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Likun HouUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Quan LiUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mackenzie BatesUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nhu-An PhamUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ming-Sound TsaoUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5) is a target of antibody-drug conjugate therapy for NSCLC. High expression of CEACAM5 has been reported in approximately 25% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. However, CEACAM5 expression has not been systematically examined in a real-world and large patient population with NSCLC. There are also limited data on the prognostic impact of CEACAM5 protein expression. Methods: We assessed CEACAM5 protein expression by immunohistochemistry in two separate cohorts of patients with NSCLC to include both routine clinical biopsy and resection specimens, using the anti-CEACAM5 clone 769 antibody assay protocol and scoring scheme for the tusamitamab ravtansine clinical trials. Expression levels were categorized as high (≥50% tumor cells at ≥2+ intensity), moderate (1%-49% tumor cells at ≥2+ intensity), and negative (0/1+ intensity) and scored independently by three thoracic pathologists. Interrater reliability was determined by Kendall's coefficient of concordance and Fleiss' kappa. Association with PD-L1 and driver mutation was calculated by Fisher exact or chi-square test. Correlation with recurrence-free survival and overall survival was determined by log-rank tests. Results: The interrater reliability of CEACAM5 assessment was moderate among three pathologists. The overall prevalence of high CEACAM5 expression was 18%. CEACAM5 expression did not significantly correlate with tumor stage, PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden, and Conclusions: Our data revealed that 18% of routinely diagnosed clinical NSCLC samples had high CEACAM5 expression by immunohistochemistry, and its expression was not associated with oncogenic driver mutations or patient prognosis in a predominantly early stage NSCLC cohort.

Indexed as

Antibody-drug conjugateBiomarkerCEACAM5Lung cancerPrognostic marker

Identifiers

PMID41584721
PMCPMC12828397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.