ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2026
Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life With Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel in Metastatic NSCLC: The Phase 3, Randomized EVOKE-01 Trial.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05089734 (Open-Label, Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 3 Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Open-Label, Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 3 Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Progression on or After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the phase 3 EVOKE-01 trial (NCT05089734), sacituzumab govitecan (SG) exhibited a numerical improvement in overall survival and tolerability compared with docetaxel in patients with metastatic NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein (ligand) 1 inhibitors, although results were not statistically significant. This analysis evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from EVOKE-01. Methods: Patients (N = 603) were randomized 1:1 to SG (n = 299) or docetaxel (n = 304) in 21-day cycles. HRQoL was assessed by the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), and EuroQol 5 Dimension 3-level questionnaire. Least square mean changes from baseline at week 25, time to first meaningful deterioration or death, and time to confirmed deterioration were analyzed. Results: SG exhibited significantly and meaningfully better effects than docetaxel on NSCLC-SAQ shortness of breath (SoB), fatigue, total score, and on QLQ-C30 role functioning, fatigue, and dyspnea. Time to first meaningful deterioration or death favored SG over docetaxel for NSCLC-SAQ SoB (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval ]: 0.75 [0.61-0.91]), fatigue (0.70 [0.57-0.86]), and total score (0.80 [0.66-0.97]); QLQ-C30 fatigue (0.80 [0.66-0.96]) and dyspnea (0.74 [0.60-0.90]); and EuroQol visual analog scale (0.79 [0.65-0.96]). The time to confirmed deterioration favored SG over docetaxel for NSCLC-SAQ SoB (0.59 [0.44-0.77]) and fatigue (0.70 [0.52-0.95]), and QLQ-C30 fatigue (0.75 [0.59-0.95]). Conclusions: These exploratory results suggest that SG may benefit HRQoL over docetaxel, supporting SG as an active therapeutic agent for metastatic NSCLC post platinum-based and programmed cell death protein (ligand) 1 inhibitor therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.