ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025
Being (a) patient-navigating desire through online communities in assisted reproductive technology.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Italy faces a significant demographic decline, with Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) becoming a critical response to infertility. Despite its medicalization, ART remains socially ambivalent, marked by stigma and emotional isolation. Online platforms provide spaces for navigating this complex experience. This study, part of the PRIN PNRR Fertility Over fortIES (FORTIES) project, explores how digital communities dedicated to ART serve as socio-technical environments for articulating and transforming reproductive desire, focusing on stigma, knowledge sharing, and emotional support. Materials and methods: We conducted a netnographic study across three digital spaces: a public ForumFree forum, Facebook groups, and a Telegram chat. Data were collected via web scraping, manual archiving, and platform-specific data extraction tools. The analysis employed a grounded theory approach in Nvivo software, focusing on themes of medical knowledge, emotional support, and the performativity of parenthood. Results: The netnographic analysis revealed discursive practices and relational strategies that shape the experience of ART pathways in online communities. A central theme was the female predominance on the platforms, driven by women's higher participation in seeking health information and the uneven medical burden in ART. Digital communities legitimize experiences by offering emotional support and validation, normalizing vulnerability and anxiety common in ART journeys. The sharing of clinical and personal experiences creates a hybrid form of situated knowledge, bridging technical language with lived experience. Parenthood is presented as a symbolic, uncertain process, anticipated before pregnancy. Platforms foster ritualized waiting practices, helping manage uncertainty. The analysis of affordances showed how platform features shape specific interaction dynamics. Discussion: ART is a complex, multimodal experience involving clinical, emotional, and relational dimensions. In Italy, infertility and medicalized parenthood are often stigmatized, pushing these experiences into digital spaces where platforms such as Telegram, Facebook, and ForumFree provide crucial support and community. These platforms allow users to share personal and medical experiences, manage uncertainty, and create a sense of belonging. However, challenges such as access barriers, misinformation, and the reinforcement of normative expectations remain. The study highlights that ART is not just a medical process but is deeply shaped by digital storytelling and collective participation, influencing how reproductive subjectivities are constructed and understood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.