ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
A precise berry counting method for in-cluster grapes to guide berry thinning.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In table grape production, berry thinning is a vital management practice where workers remove berries to achieve a target number per cluster. However, this process fundamentally depends on obtaining an accurate initial berry count, which currently relies on manual methods. These conventional approaches are labor-intensive, slow, and error-prone, posing a significant bottleneck to efficient and precise vineyard management. This study proposes a method comprising a dual-branch network named MVDNet and a post-processing algorithm. MVDNet simultaneously performs density map regression for berry counting and bunch segmentation. Its architecture employs a Front-end containing UIB modules for feature extraction, multi-scale feature fusion for spatial detail reconstruction, and a parameter-free SimAM attention mechanism to enhance salient berry features. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves competitive performance, with MVDNet attaining a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 7.7, a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 12.6, and a Mean Intersection Over Union (MIoU) of 0.90 on the test set. Remarkably, our model delivers this high accuracy with extremely low computational resource consumption, containing only 3.372 million parameters, underscoring its suitability for deployment on resource-constrained edge devices. Furthermore, the subsequent post-processing algorithm for per-cluster berry counting achieves a high coefficient of determination (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.