Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584599›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Engineering the next generation of CAR T- cells: precision modifications, logic gates and universal strategies to overcome exhaustion and tumor resistance.

Juan Esteban Garcia-Robledo, Sergio Cabrera-Salcedo, Andreas Michael Brandauer, Francesco Romano, Joshua Rengifo-Martinez, Alejandro Toro-Pedroza, Juan Sebastián Victoria, Lady J Rios-Serna, Alexandre Loukanov, Andrés Felipe Cardona and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juan Esteban Garcia-RobledoLiliCAR-T Group, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Sergio Cabrera-SalcedoLiliCAR-T Group, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Andreas Michael BrandauerDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Francesco RomanoDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Joshua Rengifo-MartinezLiliCAR-T Group, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Alejandro Toro-PedrozaLiliCAR-T Group, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Juan Sebastián VictoriaLiliCAR-T Group, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Lady J Rios-SernaLiliCAR-T Group, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Alexandre LoukanovLiliCAR-T Group, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Andrés Felipe CardonaDepartment of Oncology, Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación Sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo (CTIC), Bogotá, Colombia.
Pietro GenoveseDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Juan Camilo BaenaLiliCAR-T Group, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of hematologic malignancies, delivering durable remissions in diseases previously associated with poor outcomes. However, translating this success to solid tumors has proven challenging due to antigen heterogeneity, limited tumor infiltration, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments, and progressive T-cell exhaustion. In response, next-generation CAR T-cell platforms have emerged that integrate advances in receptor architecture, intracellular signaling, and programmable control systems to enhance specificity, persistence, and safety. This review comprehensively examines recent innovations in CAR T-cell engineering, including optimization of extracellular binding domains, hinge and transmembrane modifications, fine-tuning of intracellular signaling motifs, and the incorporation of alternative protein scaffolds. We discuss logic-gated strategies such as synNotch receptors, inducible ON-switch CARs, inhibitory CARs, and modular adaptor systems that enable context-dependent activation and reduce off-tumor toxicity. In parallel, we explore approaches aimed at overcoming T-cell dysfunction through intrinsic checkpoint rewiring, cytokine armoring, and epigenetic reprogramming to sustain antitumor activity in hostile microenvironments. The development of allogeneic and off-the-shelf CAR T-cell products derived from healthy donors, induced pluripotent stem cells, natural killer cells, γδ T cells, and macrophages is also reviewed, highlighting strategies to mitigate graft-versus-host disease and host immune rejection while enabling scalable manufacturing. Finally, we address current translational bottlenecks related to immunogenicity, regulatory complexity, and production logistics, and outline future directions for integrating Boolean logic circuits, safety switches, and automated GMP-compliant processes. Collectively, these advances position next-generation CAR T-cell therapies as programmable and adaptable immunotherapeutic platforms with the potential to extend durable clinical benefit beyond hematologic cancers into solid tumors.

Indexed as

CAR T cellsCell therapy 4genetic engineeringsolid tumors (ST)tumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41584599
PMCPMC12827139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.