ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Machine learning models based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for predicting survival in T
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unveiling the Diagnostic Value and Potential Therapeutic Targets of Phenylalanine Metabolism in Pancreatic Cancer via Integrated Multi-Omics and Machine Learning.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although early gastric cancer (EGC) is generally limited to the mucosal and submucosal layers, lymph node metastasis can still occur, which may worsen the prognosis, particularly when the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) is inadequate. This study introduces log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) as a prognostic factor and integrates it with machine learning to improve survival predictions in T Methods: This retrospective study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and an independent validation cohort from the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital First Medical Center. Predictive factors were selected using LASSO regression and multivariate Cox regression. Cox proportional-hazards (CoxPH), random survival forest (RSF), and XGBoost models were developed to predict overall survival (OS). Model interpretability and feature importance were evaluated using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. Results: A total of 419 T Conclusions: Integrating LODDS staging into the RSF model, alongside other clinical features, provides a highly accurate tool for survival prediction in T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.