Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584553›Full record

ArticleJSES international2025

Optimization of lesser tuberosity osteotomy repair: a biomechanical assessment of suture tensioning, repair configuration, and type of suture.

Mitchell H Negus, Peter W Kurtz, Megan Welsh, Shuchun Sun, Robert J Reis, Brandon L Rogalski, Richard J Friedman, Jeremy L Gilbert, Josef K Eichinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mitchell H NegusDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Peter W KurtzDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Medical University of South Carolina Bioengineering Program, Charleston, SC, USA.
Megan WelshDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Shuchun SunDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Medical University of South Carolina Bioengineering Program, Charleston, SC, USA.
Robert J ReisDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Brandon L RogalskiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Richard J FriedmanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Jeremy L GilbertDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Medical University of South Carolina Bioengineering Program, Charleston, SC, USA.
Josef K EichingerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) is an effective method to manage the subscapularis for total shoulder arthroplasty but requires adequate compression and stability for healing after repair. The optimal configuration and type of sutures for LTO repair are unknown. The effect of variable surgeon strength on repair is similarly an unknown factor and may play a role in construct repair security. This study measured, in vitro, the effect of suture number and the effect of surgeon manual strength on repair. We hypothesized that increasing the number of sutures or selecting suture tapes over conventional sutures produces a stronger repair. Secondarily, we hypothesized that differences in surgeon manual strength introduce variability into the strength of the repair. Methods: A custom jig was used to mechanically test conventional #5 braided suture and 1.7 mm suture tape. Combinations of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 sutures of each type were preloaded, cyclically loaded, and loaded to ultimate failure. After measuring grip strength and traction strength of 3 orthopedic surgeons, we tested their hand-tied repairs and compared them to a self-tensioning suture cerclage system. Results: Increasing the number of sutures significantly increased the strength of repair in a relatively linear fashion ( Conclusion: Four sutures appear to be an efficient number for LTO repair, as we observed no appreciable increase in strength with the addition of a fifth suture. There was no difference in strength between the suture types. Hand-tied repairs exhibit significant differences in strength among surgeons. If a surgeon considers this variation unfavorable, they may opt to use a tensioning device to ensure consistent repair strength according to their clinical judgment.

Indexed as

Lesser tuberosity osteotomyMechanical studySutureTensioning deviceTotal shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41584553
PMCPMC12828187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.