ArticleJSES international2025
Long-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair: a 10-year follow-up study.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) is the gold standard for anterior shoulder dislocation, with many studies demonstrating favorable short-term outcomes. However, few reports focus on the long-term outcomes, partly due to a challenge of following up younger patients. This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes of ABR. Methods: This study included 32 shoulders (19 males, 13 females; mean age at surgery: 31 years) out of 55 shoulders that underwent ABR at our institution between 2011 and 2019. Inclusion criteria required a minimum follow-up period of 5 years, and data were collected through telephone surveys or direct examinations. The survey assessed recurrent dislocation or subluxation, shoulder pain, apprehension, return to sports (complete, partial, or inability), and revision surgery. Direct examinations included physical assessments and plain x-rays. The Rowe score and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score were assessed. Adjunct data on surgical procedures and intra-articular lesions were also reviewed. Results: The mean follow-up period was 10 years (range: 6-14 years). Recurrent dislocation occurred in 3 shoulders (10%), and subluxation in 7 shoulders (22%), yielding a total recurrence rate of 28%. Recurrences were associated with sports or traumatic events. Sports return rates were 72% (23 shoulders) for complete return, 16% (5 shoulders) for partial return, and 13% (4 shoulders) for inability (rugby, volleyball, and judo). Shoulder pain (2-3 in numeric rating scale) was reported in 2 shoulders, and apprehension in the abduction and external rotation position was observed in 4 shoulders (13%). The Rowe score significantly improved from 44 ± 8 points (mean ± standard deviation) to 87 ± 21 points ( Conclusion: The average 10-year postoperative recurrence rate was 28%, consistent with the previous systematic reviews. While the recurrence rates increased over time, patient satisfaction remained high, and no revision surgeries were required. These findings demonstrate the long-term reliability of ABR for anterior shoulder instability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.