ReviewJSES international2025
Investigating the effectiveness of stretching interventions on post-traumatic elbow stiffness: a systematic review.
Review in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a significant complication following traumatic elbow injury, with incidence up to 56%. A loss of 50% of elbow range-of-movement represents a total loss of 80% of upper limb function, a challenge for both patients and clinicians. There are no established guidelines for the physiotherapy management of elbow stiffness following traumatic injury. Understanding the best treatment for nonarthritic elbow stiffness and most effective rehabilitation for prevention of stiffness following trauma or surgery are two of the top 10 James Lind Alliance priorities for elbow conditions. The study investigates the effectiveness of clinical stretching interventions, either via hold-relax manual techniques or bracing, on post-traumatic elbow stiffness in previously healthy elbow joints. Methods: A systematic search of five databases was performed until July 2024. Search terms related to the condition and interventions were used, without limits on date, language, or design. Adults aged ≥18 years with post-traumatic elbow stiffness, investigating any clinical stretch intervention, were eligible. Chronic or overuse elbow injuries and studies assessing alternative conservative interventions were excluded. Outcomes studied were elbow range-of-movement, function, and pain. Two reviewers screened articles and independently rated the evidence using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data were extracted, tabulated, and narratively synthesized. Results: Nine studies were included, involving a total 312 participants. Three small randomized controlled trials investigated manual stretches using hold-relax stretch-reflex techniques in early post-traumatic elbow stiffness, with no adverse events reported. One randomized controlled trial and five retrospective case series studies investigated brace interventions in persistent post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Clinically important improvements were reported in elbow flexion and extension range-of-movement following both intervention types (hold-relax and bracing). Bracing interventions had more adverse events. Insufficient information was available regarding adherence to protocols. Heterogeneity and incomplete reporting prevented meta-analysis. Conclusion: Hold-relax interventions may be used for early post-traumatic elbow stiffness, with weaker evidence supporting bracing in persistent elbow stiffness. Limitations included the study risk of bias and number of participants, with larger, multicenter studies warranted to confirm and quantify the effect size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.