ArticleJSES international2025
Scapular (glenoid and acromion) osteotomies for the treatment of posterior shoulder instability: technique and preliminary results.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes and care in patients with posterior glenohumeral instability treated with bone block technique.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2026Article
- Correction of Static Posterior Shoulder Subluxation Through Correction of Acromial and Glenoid Deformities (SCOPE) Is Maintained at 5 Years: A Concise Follow-up of a Previous Report.JBJS case connector · 2026Article
- Scapular Morphology and Posterior Shoulder Stability: Biomechanical Evidence From an Advanced Cadaveric Shoulder Simulator.The American journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Static and dynamic posterior shoulder instability (PSI) are associated with a higher, more horizontal acromion providing poor posterior humeral head (HH) coverage. The current surgical treatment yields unsatisfactory long-term outcomes with high recurrence rates in dynamic and failure to restore joint concentricity in static PSI. We hypothesized that restoring physiological acromio-glenoid relations would prevent recurrence of dynamic and positively influence static PSI. Methods: This study reports the outcome after a "scapular (acromion and glenoid) corrective osteotomy for posterior escape procedure in 9 consecutive patients at a minimum 2-year follow-up. One patient had static, 2 had dynamic and 6 had combined PSI. Osteotomies to restore normal scapular bony anatomy were three-dimensionally planned and executed with three-dimensional printed cutting and reduction guides. Preoperatively and postoperatively the absolute Constant Scores (CS), relative CS, subjective shoulder value and glenohumeral subluxation indices (GHSIs) and scapulohumeral subluxation indices (SHSIs) were measured. Results: The mean age at surgery was 37 years (±9.3; 23-47) and mean follow-up was 29 months (±8). In 6 patients, the operation was a revision. In 1 case, we operatively failed to achieve the planned correction resulting in clinical failure, persistent subluxation, and osteoarthritis progression. For the other 8 patients, the median subjective shoulder value increased by 42.5%, absolute CS by 18 points, relative CS by 18%, pain score by 3.5 points. The SHSI was ≥61% in 7/7 patients, GHSI was ≥55% in 4/7 patients. In 5/7 patients with pathological SHSI, the HH was recentered; in 2/7, it was improved but remained ≥61%. In 2/4 patients with the pathological GHSI, the HH was recentered, and improved but remained ≥55% in the other 2. All patients had subjectively stable shoulders. Conclusion: At a minimum of 2 years successful correction of scapular anatomy can improve static subluxation and restore subjective and objective shoulder stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.