ArticleJSES international2025
Interest in computer-assisted surgery on the glenoid implant positioning in the context of navigated or planned total shoulder arthroplasties.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigation-recorded plan execution in augmented total shoulder arthroplasty using the Advita GPS system and implant platform.JSES international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Three-dimensional planning and intraoperative navigation are beneficial for glenoid implant positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The respective benefits of these two techniques are still being evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of intraoperative navigation to glenoid implant positioning, compared with planning alone. Our hypothesis is that the use of intraoperative navigation can help to come closer to the planned positioning of the implant, compared with standard instrumentation. Methods: This monocentric, ongoing study included 205 shoulders (197 patients) operated between 2018 and 2024 for a TSA, anatomic or reverse. All patients benefited from preoperative planning (Equinoxe Planning App; Exactech, Gainesville, FL, USA), enabling the collection of native glenoid parameters. Postoperatively, these were assessed using the same method via the planning software. One hundred fifty-three TSA were included, and we identified 2 groups: 101 navigated TSA (navigated planned arthroplasties [NAV] group) and 52 planned TSA (planned arthroplasties [PLA] group), comparable in all respects (68% women, mean age 72.5 years). Version and inclination were compared, as well as the difference between planned and postoperative. Results: The average native glenoid parameters measured and planned were similar between the two groups. The average postoperative version was respectively -2.5° (±4.7°) vs. -1.6° (±6.2°) in the NAV group ( Discussion: Our study highlights the benefits of preoperative planning. We found a reduction in the deviation from planning for reverseTSA, as well as a reduction in the proportion of mispositioned implants. Our series is limited by the absence of randomization. Further studies are needed on clinical improvement after navigation-assisted surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.