ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
Assessment of phylogenetic informativeness in mitochondrial and nuclear genes for mammalian systematics using sparse learning.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the growing availability of nuclear genomic data, mitochondrial genes remain the most widely used molecular markers in mammalian systematics. However, a quantitative assessment of the phylogenetic information content of mitochondrial loci compared to nuclear loci has never been carried out. Here, we apply a sparse learning approach based on Lasso regression to evaluate the contribution of alignment sites to phylogenetic likelihoods, providing the first estimates of phylogenetically effective lengths for markers commonly used in mammalian systematics. Analyzing more than 30,000 complete mammalian mitochondrial genomes and nuclear panels composed of either 100 randomly selected complete coding sequences or of partial gene segments from conventional markers, we examined phylogenetic informativeness at two taxonomic levels: within-species and among-species. On average, ∼32% of mitochondrial sites and ∼38% of nuclear sites were classified as phylogenetically informative. We found that the number of phylogenetically informative sites were positively correlated with total gene length. Therefore, longer mitochondrial genes, particularly
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.