ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026
An EACVI survey assessing the awareness of cardiovascular imaging's environmental impact among cardiovascular imagers.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From precision to planetary health: the carbon cost of AI in multimodality cardiovascular imaging.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Climate change poses a major threat to global health, with implications for cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular imaging warrants attention due to its environmental footprint. Despite recognition of the need for climate-conscious healthcare, awareness and implementation of sustainable practices among cardiovascular imagers remain unclear. This study aims to assess current awareness, knowledge, and attitudes regarding climate change and sustainable cardiovascular imaging. Methods and results: An anonymous 2-month online survey was disseminated via European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging newsletters, social media, and direct invitations. It explored: (i) general environmental consciousness, (ii) knowledge of climate-cardiovascular links, (iii) perceived barriers, strategies, incentives, and communication tools, and (iv) the survey's potential influence on practice. A total of 218 participants from 41 countries responded (51% female; 91% cardiologists; and 84% Europe). Only 11% had received formal education on climate or sustainable healthcare. Self -reported environmental consciousness was low in 12%, moderate in 65%, and high in 23%. While 90% acknowledged healthcare professionals' responsibility in addressing climate change, 60% rarely considered environmental impact when requesting imaging. Knowledge was limited: only 63% correctly answered ≥4 of 7 questions. Main barriers were the lack of awareness (47%) and institutional or medico-legal pressures encouraging frequent imaging (33%). Reducing unnecessary imaging and improving education were seen as the most effective strategies to address these barriers (50%). After completing the survey, 84% reported greater inclination to consider sustainable practice. Conclusion: This international survey highlights a gap between environmental concern and its integration into cardiovascular imaging. Education, institutional support, and system-level strategies are needed to foster sustainable practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.