Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584480›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Blood Pressure Management Following Endovascular Stroke Treatment: A Feasibility Trial and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.

Aristeidis H Katsanos, Luciana Catanese, Demetrios J Sahlas, Abhilek Srivastava, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki, Kanjana Perera, Kelvin K H Ng, Raed Joundi, Brian Van Adel, Ramiro Larrazabal and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Systolic blood pressure targets after successful endovascular thrombectomy: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Aristeidis H KatsanosDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6359-0023
Luciana CataneseDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Demetrios J SahlasDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Abhilek SrivastavaDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Areti-Angeliki VeronikiKnowledge Translation Program Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada.
Kanjana PereraDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Kelvin K H NgDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Raed JoundiDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Brian Van AdelDivision of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Diagnostic Imaging Hamilton General Hospital McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Ramiro LarrazabalDivision of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Diagnostic Imaging Hamilton General Hospital McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Christine HawkesDepartment of Medicine (Division of Neurology) Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Aviraj DeshmukhDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) Northern Ontario School of Medicine Sudbury Ontario Canada.
Kanchana RatnayakeDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Lina PalaiodimouSecond Department of Neurology Attikon University Hospital National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece.
Georgios TsivgoulisSecond Department of Neurology Attikon University Hospital National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece.
Oscar BenaventeDivision of Neurology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
Robert HartDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Mukul SharmaDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Ashkan ShoamaneshDepartment of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although postprocedure blood pressure (BP) correlates with outcome in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), the optimal target is unknown. Methods: We performed a pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial enrolling participants with persistently elevated BP after successful EVT. Participants were randomized within 1 hour from the end of EVT to either intensive (systolic BP target <140 mmHg) or standard BP target (systolic BP <180 mmHg) for 48 hours. The main end point was feasibility, which was assessed with the enrollment rate and adherence to allocated BP target. Exploratory end points included neurologic deterioration, functional improvement, intracranial hemorrhage, and flow dynamics detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. We included the outcomes of our trial in an aggregate data meta-analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials evaluating the utility of BP control after successful EVT. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was 3-month good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤2. Results: Between October 23, 2020, and February 4, 2023, 221 patients were screened and 30 were randomized (14%; average recruitment of 1.2 participants/month). Participants in the intensive BP arm had a mean±SD systolic BP of 131±18 mm Hg over 48 hours (75% of the readings were <140 mm Hg), whereas participants in the standard BP arm had a mean±SD 48-hour systolic BP of 139±18 mm Hg (48% of the readings were between 140 and 180 mm Hg). No differences between the 2 groups were documented in any of the predefined exploratory end points. In a meta-analysis of 5 randomized-controlled clinical trials involving 1558 participants, intensive BP control was associated with lower probability for 3-month good functional outcome (odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.82]; I Conclusions: The natural course of BP normalization following successful recanalization poses challenges to the conduct and success of randomized-controlled clinical trials evaluating different BP thresholds after EVT. Meta-analysis of existing trials suggests harm associated with active BP lowering.

Indexed as

blood pressureendovascular thrombectomylarge‐vessel occlusionmeta‐analysisoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID41584480
PMCPMC12778499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.