Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584476›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Proliferative Angiopathy: A Systematic Review.

Nolan J Brown, Brian V Lien, Jeff Ehresman, Redi Rahmani, Joshua S Catapano, Michael T Lawton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cerebral proliferative angiopathy in pediatric patients: case-based review with an illustrative case.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nolan J BrownDepartment of Neurological Surgery University of California-Irvine Orange CA.
Brian V LienDepartment of Neurological Surgery University of California-Irvine Orange CA.
Jeff EhresmanDepartment of Neurosurgery Barrow Neurological Institute St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix AZ.
Redi RahmaniDepartment of Neurosurgery Barrow Neurological Institute St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix AZ.
Joshua S CatapanoDepartment of Neurosurgery Barrow Neurological Institute St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix AZ.
Michael T LawtonDepartment of Neurosurgery Barrow Neurological Institute St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix AZ.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1887-3980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: First described over 4 decades ago as a diffuse form of arteriovenous malformation, cerebral proliferative angiopathy (CPA) is now categorized as a distinct vascular anomaly. Unlike arteriovenous malformation, which typically forms a well-developed vascular nidus with feeder vessels and distinct venous outflow, CPA is the product of disorganized angiogenesis; thus, it lacks a true nidus. Its characteristic cycle of ischemia, angiogenesis, and aberrant perfusion can lead to abnormal blood flow patterns that characterize the disease. Treatment of CPA has historically relied on conservative management (antiepileptic drugs), and efforts to effectively manage this pathology have been hindered by an incomplete understanding of its natural history. Methods: A systematic search of 4 databases was performed. The following variables were extracted when present: study sample size, year of publication, age(s) of patient(s), sex, presenting signs and symptoms, neurological deficits (pre- and postoperative), type of intervention, average follow-up time, and patient-reported as well as functional outcomes at last follow-up. Results: Following the search and screen, 48 studies reporting 105 CPA cases remained eligible for inclusion. These studies consisted of 41 case reports, 6 case series, and 1 retrospective cohort study. The most common modality used in treatment of CPA was conservative management (53.4%). The second most common treatment modality was endovascular embolization (36.9%). The least common treatment modality was gamma knife radiosurgery, which was used in only 2 patients. Eleven patients experienced intracranial hemorrhage as a complication of CPA; 10 of the 11 patients underwent decompressive craniectomy. Finally, revascularization surgery was reportedly used in 5 patients (4.9%). Conclusion: Although there remains a dearth of studies reporting CPA, several clearly defined traits have been identified that characterize this pathology and distinguish it from arteriovenous malformation. Nonetheless, the verdict has not yet been reached regarding the effectiveness of surgical interventions.

Indexed as

aneurysmanomalyarteriovenous malformationcerebral proliferative angiographyembolizationhemorrhageinfarctischemiarevascularization

Identifiers

PMID41584476
PMCPMC12778500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.