ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2025
A topological hypothesis for atrial fibrilllation, atrial flutter and focal atrial tachycardia: comparison and contrast with Kosterlitz-Thouless physics.
Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the role of topology is established in active matter systems, its importance in cardiac electrophysiology, particularly concerning common arrhythmias, warrants further emphasis. Atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) are the most prevalent arrhythmias impacting human health. This article proposes a framework conceptualizing these atrial rhythm disturbances through the lens of topological states and phase transitions, drawing inspiration from the Kosterlitz-Thouless (KT) transition. Central to this framework is the hypothesis that distinct arrhythmia patterns emerge as discrete topological states constrained by the fundamental requirement that the net topological charge (associated with electrical phase singularities or vortices) must sum to zero across the atrial tissue. Within this constrained topological perspective, AF, characterised by disorganised activity, is likened to the KT unbound vortex state, dominated by disorder with repetitive vortex regeneration and an exponential decay in spatial correlation. In contrast, AFL, with its organized regularity, resembles the KT bound vortex state, where vortex-antivortex pairs result in ordered activity. Finally, FAT and Sinus Rhythm are characterized as topologically vortex-free states exhibiting ordered planar wave conduction. Importantly, while the resulting topological states show clear analogies, the specific biophysical mechanisms driving vortex defect formation, interaction, and unbinding in cardiac tissue likely differ significantly from the thermal free-energy considerations governing the classic KT transition. This viewpoint frames the transition between arrhythmias as a change in the topological organization of atrial electrical activity, governed by charge conservation principles and cardiac-specific dynamics. This perspective may offer novel diagnostic and therapeutic avenues applicable to human cardiac mapping procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.