Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584432›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

Characteristics and determinants of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in Chinese nursing students: A cross-sectional study.

Xuefen Lan, Min Li, Yu Wang, Miaoqin Chen, Heyun Jiang, Shunfei Lu, Ying Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xuefen LanNursing Department, Medicine College, Lishui University, Lishui Zhejiang, China.
Min LiNursing Department, Medicine College, Lishui University, Lishui Zhejiang, China.
Yu WangNursing Department, Medicine College, Lishui University, Lishui Zhejiang, China.
Miaoqin ChenLishui Vocational and Technical College, Lishui Zhejiang, China.
Heyun JiangStudents Affairs Office, Medicine College, Lishui University, Lishui Zhejiang, China.
Shunfei LuMedicine College, Lishui University, Lishui Zhejiang, China.
Ying ZhouNursing Department, Medicine College, Lishui University, Lishui Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence literacy is essential for nursing students to become competent in navigating contemporary healthcare complexities and to ensure safe patient care. This literacy is needed urgently due to the rapid integration of artificial intelligence into the clinical, educational, and research domains. This integration requires immediate adaptation in order to mitigate ethical risks in tech-driven healthcare. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine both the level and determinants of artificial intelligence literacy among nursing students. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 1 to April 20, 2025. Settings: This study was conducted at a public higher education institution that offered a Master of Science in Nursing program. Participants: Four hundred and twenty-three nursing students were enrolled in the study using convenience sampling. Methods: Anonymous, self-administered online questionnaires were completed by the participants. Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, frequencies, and percentages were computed to characterize the sample. Multivariable linear regression analysis with adjustment for relevant covariates was then performed to examine potential associations between the variables. Results: Moderate but uneven artificial intelligence literacy was observed among the nursing students, with a mean artificial intelligence literacy scale score of 59.67 (SD = 8.52). The ethics dimension was the least developed, in contrast to better performance in operational usage. Significant predictors of artificial intelligence literacy included frequency of artificial intelligence use, attitudes toward artificial intelligence, and digital literacy. Dimension-specific associations were identified and included correlation of awareness with gender, attitudes toward artificial intelligence, interest in artificial intelligence and digital literacy; usage with age, frequency of artificial intelligence use, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence; evaluation with attitudes toward artificial intelligence; and ethics with gender. Conclusions: This study identified key determinants that influenced the artificial intelligence literacy of nursing students and showed that artificial intelligence ethics was the most deficient domain among Chinese nursing cohorts. Notably, the frequency of artificial intelligence use, attitudes toward artificial intelligence, interest in artificial intelligence, and digital literacy collectively shaped the artificial intelligence literacy profiles of nursing students. Practical implications including developing and implementing targeted interventions such as artificial intelligence ethics workshops and digital literacy curricula are necessary to enhance ethical competencies and promote digital readiness. These interventions will equip nursing students for artificial intelligence -integrated healthcare environments and inform policy reforms in nursing education.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceArtificial intelligence literacyInfluencing factorsNursing students

Identifiers

PMID41584432
PMCPMC12828738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.