ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Nursing management decisions in fever: a mixed-methods approach to understanding.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fever is a common symptom among hospitalized patients and often triggers nursing interventions. Although clinical guidelines recommend the use of antipyretics primarily to alleviate patient discomfort rather than to normalize temperature, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments remain routinely employed. However, the rationale behind these interventions in adult care settings remains poorly understood. Aim: This study aims to explore how nurses manage fever in adult patients and examine the rationale underpinning their clinical decisions in fever management. Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data on nurses' fever management and decision-making for patients with fever were collected via an online survey of 177 registered nurses in Scotland. Qualitative data on nurses' rationale and experience in managing fever were obtained through open-text responses in the online survey and five follow-up interviews. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were integrated to interpret findings. Results: Independent nursing judgement was the most frequently cited rationale for fever intervention (49.2 %). However, according to the qualitative finding, clinical decisions were predominantly influenced by habitual routines, institutional norms, and risk-averse thinking. Participants frequently initiated interventions as part of the Sepsis Six protocol, even in the absence of confirmed infection. Fever phobia, defined as exaggerated perceptions of fever-related harm, was evident in both interview and questionnaire data. Comfort was commonly cited as a justification for treatment, yet few participants reassessed patient comfort after administering interventions. Conclusion: Nurses' fever management is influenced more by embedded routines and clinical culture than by formal knowledge or guideline adherence. Fever phobia and Sepsis Six pressures can contribute to unnecessary intervention, highlighting the need for reflective education and systems-level support for evidence-based practice.The result of this study illustrated the potential for overtreatment in fever care and provides actionable insights to support evidence-informed decision-making in nursing practice. Future initiatives should focus on challenging fever phobia, supporting critical reflection, and aligning practice with current evidence through targeted educational strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.