Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584413›Full record

ReviewCurrent health sciences journal

Epidemiological Indices for Assessing Oral Hygiene: A Relevant Tool in Public Health.

Daniel Băluță, Mihaela Tănase, Andreea Mihaela Băluță, Anca Oana Dragomirescu, Ecaterina Ionescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel BăluțăDepartment of Restorative Odontotherapy, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Mihaela TănaseDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Andreea Mihaela BăluțăDepartment of Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Anca Oana DragomirescuDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Ecaterina IonescuDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various epidemiological indices have been developed to quantify oral hygiene and plaque accumulation, aiding clinical assessment and public health initiatives. The aim of this study was to highlight the main epidemiological indices used for standardized evaluation of oral hygiene and dental plaque, crucial for monitoring and control at both individual and population levels for preventive reason. MATERIAL AND

methodThrough a narrative review, the article analyzes the main indices used to assess oral hygiene.

resultsSome of the most clinically relevant indices are represented by the Oral Hygiene Index (OHI), Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S), and Patient Hygiene Performance (PHP), which evaluate soft debris and calculus presence. Our research also covers several bacterial plaque indices including the Silness & Löe Plaque Index, Quigley-Hein Plaque Index, O'Leary Plaque Index, and Approximal Plaque Index (API), which measure plaque thickness and distribution.

conclusionsThe epidemiological indices presented serve as essential tools for dental practitioners and public health professionals to objectively assess oral hygiene status, guide personalized treatments, monitor progress and evaluate preventive programs.

Indexed as

dental plaqueEpidemiological indicesoral healthoral hygieneprevention

Identifiers

PMID41584413
PMCPMC12831552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.