Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584375›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of translational medical research and public health2025

Building Real-World Evidence Infrastructure to Improve Health and Healthcare in the United States: Part I-Coordinated Registry Networks and Systemic Coordinated Inter-Organizational Networks.

Osman Nuri Yogurtcu, Laura E Gressler, Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen, Kashif Haqqi, Colin Shepard, Orestis A Panagiotou, Santiago J Molina, Philip P Goodney, Ali B Abbasi, Brian S Anderson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of translational medical research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Osman Nuri YogurtcuOffice of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4987-3753
Laura E GresslerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Jens Eldrup-JorgensenDivision of Vascular Surgery at Tufts University School of Medicine and the Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-0577
Kashif HaqqiPragmedic Solutions, Washington DC, USA.
Colin ShepardChief Medical Officer, Schmidt Initiative for Long COVID, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Orestis A PanagiotouOffice of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9604-8380
Santiago J MolinaDepartment of Sociology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9049-518X
Philip P GoodneySection of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, The Dartmouth Institute, Lebanon, ME, USA.
Ali B AbbasiDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-2832
Brian S AndersonChief Executive Officer, Coalition for Health AI, Sudbury, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-0310-6925
Wilbur C HaddenDepartment of Sociology, The Center for Innovation at University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8572-2990
James E TchengDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6231-5567
Julia SkapikInformatics for Health, Washington DC.
Gregory PappasOffice of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Funding

FDA HHS U01 FD006936Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Over the past decade substantial government and market-driven efforts focused on the use of real-world evidence (RWE) to improve healthcare decision-making. A successful strategy has been mounted by specialty societies and their registries that have created RWE through a model known as the Coordinated Registry Network (CRN), which has accelerated innovation, improved care quality, addressed the safety and efficacy of medical products, and supported medical research. This three-part manuscript works to understand how the CRNs have succeeded by applying organizational sociology and the theory of Systemic Coordinated Inter-Organizational Networks (SCIONs). Methods: We describe CRNs as organizations that evolved from the traditional registries of clinical specialty societies. We present the SCIONs theory, a network of organizations that deploy a coordination strategy based on trust and cooperation to solve complex problems. By applying sociological concepts, we identified key characteristics and functions that can inform the development of CRNs, providing practical guidance for their implementation. Results: Our analysis reveals that CRNs offer a unique mode of coordination that can address complex healthcare challenges, leveraging traditional market and government efforts. CRNs can support the vision of a learning health system and evidence-based medicine by harnessing the power of RWE, transforming, and improving healthcare delivery. Conclusion and Implications for Translation: CRNs have the potential to transform evidence generation in healthcare by curating and integrating multiple data sources that can address the data needs of multiple CRN partners. This American solution to the provision of evidence for supporting decision-making in healthcare builds on professional society relationships; the CRN model has demonstrated success in large national registries and warrants expansion to other specialty areas. By understanding the organizational sociology of CRNs, we can unlock their full potential to drive innovation, efficiency, and quality improvement in healthcare.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineLearning Health SystemPublic Reporting of Healthcare DataQuality ImprovementQuality of HealthcareRegistriesSocial Theory

Identifiers

PMID41584375
PMCPMC12828708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.