ArticleGlobal epidemiology2026
Modelling seizure-related predictors of epilepsy diagnostic gap in two urban informal settlements of Nairobi using machine learning.
Article in Global epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a wide gap in epilepsy diagnosis, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. We used machine learning models to identify seizure-related factors associated with the epilepsy diagnostic gap within the Nairobi Urban Health and Demographic Surveillance System (NUHDSS), Kenya, to inform effective community-level interventions. Methods: Data were drawn from a two-stage, population-based census. In Stage-I, 56,425 residents of NUHDSS were screened for possible convulsive and non-convulsive epilepsy using a standardized questionnaire. In Stage-II, individuals who screened positive were invited for clinical assessment and diagnostic confirmation by neurologists. We used latent class analysis to classify symptom patterns. Seven machine learning models were trained, with extreme gradient boost and random forest models achieving the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (98 %). Results: A total of 528 individuals were diagnosed with epilepsy, among whom 80 % ( Conclusion: There is critically huge diagnostic gap for epilepsy in Nairobi's informal settlements. People with subtle, fewer or less obvious seizure types are more likely to be undiagnosed. These findings highlight the importance of seizure symptom characteristics in understanding patterns of underdiagnosis. Thus, approaches to reducing the diagnostic gap should take into consideration subtle and non-convulsive seizure presentations, such as training on symptom recognition and timely care-seeking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.