ArticleNeurophotonics2026
Desensitization of opsin responses during all-optical interrogation depends on imaging parameters.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial anchoring of lipid metabolism shapes immune fate in the tumor microenvironment.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: The combination of two-photon calcium imaging and targeted two-photon optogenetic stimulation, termed all-optical interrogation, provides spatial and temporal precision when recording and manipulating neural circuit activity Aim: We aimed to investigate whether two-photon imaging of the green fluorescent calcium reporter GCaMP6s at 920 nm increase the rate of response desensitization in neurons targeted for two-photon stimulation at 1035 nm expressing the red-shifted opsin C1V1. Approach: We systematically varied either the inter-stimulus interval or the duration of two-photon calcium imaging during targeted two-photon optogenetic stimulation of mouse layer 2/3 barrel cortex or visual cortex neurons. Results: We found that two-photon imaging at 920 nm decreases trial-by-trial photostimulation responses in targeted C1V1-expressing neurons-an effect that is exacerbated at shorter inter-stimulus intervals. This is consistent with the imaging laser increasing the rate of opsin desensitization. Reduced photostimulation responses are not limited to targeted cells and are found across the field of view. Such network effects are less pronounced at shorter imaging doses. Conclusions: Our results provide methodological optimizations that enable trial-by-trial decreases in photostimulation response to be mitigated in all-optical experiments. This will reduce an external source of trial-by-trial variability in future all-optical experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.