Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584261›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence2024

MedAlign: A Clinician-Generated Dataset for Instruction Following with Electronic Medical Records.

Scott L Fleming, Alejandro Lozano, William J Haberkorn, Jenelle A Jindal, Eduardo Reis, Rahul Thapa, Louis Blankemeier, Julian Z Genkins, Ethan Steinberg, Ashwin Nayak and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A dataset and benchmark for hospital course summarization with adapted large language models.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Large language models and rheumatology: are we there yet?Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Biomedical Visual Instruction Tuning with Clinician Preference Alignment.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Scott L FlemingDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alejandro LozanoDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
William J HaberkornDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peri-operative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jenelle A JindalStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Eduardo ReisDepartment of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Rahul ThapaTechnology and Digital Solutions, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Louis BlankemeierDepartment of Electrical Enginering, Stanford School of Engineering, Stanford, CA.
Julian Z GenkinsDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ethan SteinbergDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford School of Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ashwin NayakDepartment of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Birju PatelStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Chia-Chun ChiangDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alison CallahanStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Zepeng HuoStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sergios GatidisDepartment of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Scott AdamsDepartment of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Oluseyi FayanjuDepartment of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Shreya J ShahDepartment of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Thomas SavageDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ethan GohStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Akshay S ChaudhariDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nima AghaeepourDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Christopher SharpDepartment of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michael A PfefferTechnology and Digital Solutions, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Percy LiangDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford School of Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jonathan H ChenStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Keith E MorseDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Emma P BrunskillDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford School of Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jason A FriesStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nigam H ShahTechnology and Digital Solutions, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

Rapid MRI for Evaluation of OsteoarthritisR01EB002524 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Akshay Chaudhari, Garry E Gold · 2003 to 2026
$10.1M
TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT L DELP · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
RADX TECH - CERES NANOSCIENCE INC NANOTRAP PARTICLE MANUFACTURING75N92020C00021 · NHLBI · CERES NANOSCIENCES, LLLP · PI DUNLAP, ROSS · 2021 to 2021
$4.0M
Rapid Low-Cost Quantitative 3D MRI and Gait Assessment of the KneeR01AR077604 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HARGREAVES, BRIAN ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Imaging of Joint Response to Physiological Stress with Age, Sex and in OsteoarthritisR01AR079431 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Feliks Kogan · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Opportunistic Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimation at Abdominal CTs with Robust and Unbiased Deep LearningR01HL167974 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Imon Banerjee, Akshay Chaudhari · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Machine Learning for Integrative Modeling of the Immune System in Clinical SettingsR35GM138353 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI AGHAEEPOUR, NIMA · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00008NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00021NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL167974NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077604NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079431NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002524NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow natural language instructions with human-level fluency suggests many opportunities in healthcare to reduce administrative burden and improve quality of care. However, evaluating LLMs on realistic text generation tasks for healthcare remains challenging. Existing question answering datasets for electronic health record (EHR) data fail to capture the complexity of information needs and documentation burdens experienced by clinicians. To address these challenges, we introduce MedAlign, a benchmark dataset of 983 natural language instructions for EHR data. MedAlign is curated by 15 clinicians (7 specialities), includes clinician-written reference responses for 303 instructions, and provides 276 longitudinal EHRs for grounding instruction-response pairs. We used MedAlign to evaluate 6 general domain LLMs, having clinicians rank the accuracy and quality of each LLM response. We found high error rates, ranging from 35% (GPT-4) to 68% (MPT-7B-Instruct), and 8.3% drop in accuracy moving from 32k to 2k context lengths for GPT-4. Finally, we report correlations between clinician rankings and automated natural language generation metrics as a way to rank LLMs without human review. MedAlign is provided under a research data use agreement to enable LLM evaluations on tasks aligned with clinician needs and preferences.

Identifiers

PMID41584261
PMCPMC12826664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.